In this activity, students make the connection between the fraction determined by the original rectangle and the resulting more precise fraction. The two rectangles taken together are designed to help students notice that decomposing rectangles is a geometric way to determine the greatest common factor of two numbers. (This is a geometric version of Euclid’s algorithm for finding the greatest common factor.) Students reason abstractly and quantitatively when switching between numeric and geometric representations (MP2).
Arrange students in groups of 2. Provide access to graph paper. Students work on problems alone and compare work with a partner.
Use this rectangle to answer the questions. Suppose this rectangle is 9 units by 4 units.
In the rectangle, draw a line segment that decomposes the rectangle into a new rectangle and a square that is as large as possible. Continue until your original rectangle has been entirely decomposed into squares.
How many squares of each size are there?
What are the side lengths of the last square you drew?
Write 49 as a mixed number.
Use this rectangle to answer the questions. Suppose this rectangle is 27 units by 12 units.
In the rectangle, draw a line segment that decomposes the rectangle into a new rectangle and a square that is as large as possible. Continue until your original rectangle has been entirely decomposed into squares.
How many squares of each size are there?
What are the side lengths of the last square you drew?
Write 1227 as a mixed number.
Compare the diagram you drew for this problem and the one for the earlier problem. How are they the same? How are they different?
What is the greatest common factor of 9 and 4? What is the greatest common factor of 27 and 12? What does this have to do with your diagrams of decomposed rectangles?
Sample response:
Sample response:
The purpose of this discussion is to make sure students understand that using a decomposition model can help turn fractions into mixed numbers and find the greatest common factor of the numerator and denominator. It is not necessary for students to understand a general argument for why chopping rectangles can help you know the greatest common factor of two numbers. Here are some questions for discussion:
We have seen some examples of rectangle tilings. A tiling means a way to completely cover a shape with other shapes, without any gaps or overlaps. For example, here is a tiling of rectangle KXWJ with 2 large squares, 3 medium squares, 1 small square, and 2 tiny squares.
Some of the squares used to tile this rectangle have the same size.
Is it possible to tile a rectangle with squares where the squares are all different sizes?
If you think it is possible, find an example that works. If you think it is not possible, explain why it is not possible.
Sample response: It is possible to tile a rectangle with only differently-sized squares. One example is a 32-by-33 rectangle that can be tiled with squares of side length 18, 15, 14, 10, 9, 8, 7, 4, and 1. (For more examples of solutions and more history on the matter, research Martin Gardner’s November 1958 column in Scientific American.)
All skills for this lesson
No KCs tagged for this lesson
In this activity, students make the connection between the fraction determined by the original rectangle and the resulting more precise fraction. The two rectangles taken together are designed to help students notice that decomposing rectangles is a geometric way to determine the greatest common factor of two numbers. (This is a geometric version of Euclid’s algorithm for finding the greatest common factor.) Students reason abstractly and quantitatively when switching between numeric and geometric representations (MP2).
Arrange students in groups of 2. Provide access to graph paper. Students work on problems alone and compare work with a partner.
Use this rectangle to answer the questions. Suppose this rectangle is 9 units by 4 units.
In the rectangle, draw a line segment that decomposes the rectangle into a new rectangle and a square that is as large as possible. Continue until your original rectangle has been entirely decomposed into squares.
How many squares of each size are there?
What are the side lengths of the last square you drew?
Write 49 as a mixed number.
Use this rectangle to answer the questions. Suppose this rectangle is 27 units by 12 units.
In the rectangle, draw a line segment that decomposes the rectangle into a new rectangle and a square that is as large as possible. Continue until your original rectangle has been entirely decomposed into squares.
How many squares of each size are there?
What are the side lengths of the last square you drew?
Write 1227 as a mixed number.
Compare the diagram you drew for this problem and the one for the earlier problem. How are they the same? How are they different?
What is the greatest common factor of 9 and 4? What is the greatest common factor of 27 and 12? What does this have to do with your diagrams of decomposed rectangles?
Sample response:
Sample response:
The purpose of this discussion is to make sure students understand that using a decomposition model can help turn fractions into mixed numbers and find the greatest common factor of the numerator and denominator. It is not necessary for students to understand a general argument for why chopping rectangles can help you know the greatest common factor of two numbers. Here are some questions for discussion:
We have seen some examples of rectangle tilings. A tiling means a way to completely cover a shape with other shapes, without any gaps or overlaps. For example, here is a tiling of rectangle KXWJ with 2 large squares, 3 medium squares, 1 small square, and 2 tiny squares.
Some of the squares used to tile this rectangle have the same size.
Is it possible to tile a rectangle with squares where the squares are all different sizes?
If you think it is possible, find an example that works. If you think it is not possible, explain why it is not possible.
Sample response: It is possible to tile a rectangle with only differently-sized squares. One example is a 32-by-33 rectangle that can be tiled with squares of side length 18, 15, 14, 10, 9, 8, 7, 4, and 1. (For more examples of solutions and more history on the matter, research Martin Gardner’s November 1958 column in Scientific American.)